Steps to Take After a T4 Injury and Walk Again

Front end Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 141.

Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery later spinal cord injury

Giorgio Scivoletto

ⁱSpinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

²Clinical and Enquiry Motility Analysis Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Federica Tamburella

ⁱSpinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

²Clinical and Inquiry Movement Assay Lab, Fondazione Due south. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Letizia Laurenza

^oneSpinal Cord Unit of measurement, IRCCS Fondazione South. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Monica Torre

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Marco Molinari

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

²Clinical and Enquiry Movement Analysis Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Received 2013 Dec 4; Accepted 2014 Feb 26.

Abstract

The recovery of walking function is considered of extreme relevance both by patients and physicians. Consequently, in the recent years, recovery of locomotion become a major objective of new pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions. In the terminal decade, several pharmacological handling and rehabilitative approaches have been initiated to enhance locomotion capacity of SCI patients. Basic science advances in regeneration of the central nervous system hold hope of farther neurological and functional recovery to exist studied in clinical trials. Therefore, a precise knowledge of the natural course of walking recovery after SCI and of the factors affecting the prognosis for recovery has become mandatory. In the present work we reviewed the prognostic factors for walking recovery, with item attention paid to the clinical ones (neurological examination at admission, age, etiology gender, time class of recovery). The prognostic value of some instrumental examinations has too been reviewed. Based on these factors we advise that a reliable prognosis for walking recovery is possible. Instrumental examinations, in particular evoked potentials could be useful to improve the prognosis.

Keywords: spinal cord injury, walking recovery, prognostic factors

Introduction

Walking recovery is one of the main goals of patients later SCI: walking is rated at first place (together with float and bowel function) at least past patients with incomplete lesions (Ditunno et al., 2008a). Furthermore, an epidemiological study shows an increase of the number of patients with incomplete lesions (e.g., with chances of walking recovery) (Pagliacci et al., 2003). Therefore, the recovery of ambulation has become the target of several pharmacological and rehabilitative approaches (Wernig and Muller, 1992; Domingo et al., 2012) and a precise evaluation of the natural recovery of walking and of the prognostic factors influencing this office has become mandatory (Steeves et al., 2007).

In the present piece of work we reviewed the effect of several clinical and demographic features on the prognosis for walking recovery. Furthermore, because i of the main problems of the acute stage of SCI is the lack of reliable examinations, we considered the prognostic value of neurophysiological and neuroimaging examinations.

Finally, the effect of early pharmacological and surgical interventions on walking recovery will exist examined.

Materials and methods

A systematic search was performed of all papers as well as websites mentioning spinal cord injury and walking The literature search was conducted without time limits to identify papers that explicitly mentioned the walking chapters in patients with SCI. Databases included PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Key Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus, which includes Embase citations. All report designs, including case reports, were included, with no restrictions on the ages of participants. Non-English articles and animal studies were excluded. The following search terms were used: prognosis prediction, SCI, paraplegia/tetraplegia/quadriplegia, ambulation/gait and walking/walking capacity. In add-on, other databases, such as Google and a mitt search of Spinal Cord yielded other citations non identified past the in a higher place strategy.

Ii authors (Giorgio Scivoletto and Federica Tamburella) independently identified and classified the papers through a review of the abstracts, texts, and references and circulated them to the authors' panel.

Clinical examination

The most relevant prognostic cistron for functional recovery in SCI patients is the neurological status at the moment of the first test. The physical examination of these patients has been standardized past the American Spinal Injury Association in the International Standards for Neurological Nomenclature of Spinal String Injury (ISNCSCI) (American Spinal Injury Association, 2000). Based on this examination it is possible to establish the neurological level of injury, too as the severity of the lesion (damage). Components also include a rectal examination for voluntary anal contraction and anal awareness (Figures ​ 1, ​ ii). Patients are considered to take a complete lesion (AIS harm A), according to the ASIA Damage Scale (AIS), in the absence of sensory or motor function at the everyman sacral segments. Incomplete lesions are defined when sensation and/or motor part are preserved below the neurologic level of injury, and in item in the lowest sacral segments (anal sensation, including deep anal pressure and voluntary external anal sphincter contraction) (Figure ​ ii).

Scoring sail for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

Scoring canvass for the International Standards for Neurological Nomenclature of Spinal String Injury. American Spinal Injury Clan: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

This examination should usually exist performed at 72 h later the lesion because this timing seems to have a more accurate prognostic value than earlier assessment (Herbison et al., 1991).

AIS grade conversion and walking recovery

For the aim of this review nosotros would define walking recovery as the regained ability to walk independently in the community, with or without the use of devices and braces. This is also divers "functional walking" and has been described by several authors (Hussey and Stauffer, 1973) every bit the capacity to walk reasonable distances both in and out of home unassisted by some other person.

For a long time AIS grade conversion has been considered the basis to predict the possibility of achieving functional walking. Yet, a recent commodity by van Middendorp et al. (2009) questioned the human relationship between AIS course conversion and ability to walk every bit we will prove below.

Patients with AIS impairment A (motor and sensory complete lesion) at their get-go examination take very few chances of neurological recovery beneath the lesion. When the exam is performed at 72 h post-injury, 80% of the initial AIS A patients remain as AIS A, with almost 10% converting to AIS B (i.eastward., some sensory function) and most 10% converting to AIS C (with some motor recovery beneath the lesion) (Burns et al., 2012). All the same, if the first examination is performed later, the pct of improvement decreases dramatically to ii.5% (Scivoletto et al., 2004a) (Tabular array ​ 1). Accordingly, the possibility of patients with AIS damage A of achieving functional walking is very limited too. Furthermore, also betwixt the patients who converted to an incomplete lesion just 14% recovered some walking function (van Middendorp et al., 2009). The AIS A patients who achieve some walking office usually are low thoracic or lumbar levels (T12-L3) and need braces and devices to walk (Ditunno et al., 2008b; Table ​ two). Finally, these patients are usually limited ambulators, with slow average velocities and great energy expenditure (Vaccaro et al., 1997).

Table one

Prediction of recovery according to AIS impairment calibration.

AIS grade at access	A	B	C	D
First exam at 72 h10	One-year follow-up AIS grade
A	84%	8%	5%	iii%
B	x%	30%	29%	31%
C	ii%	2%	25%	67%
D	2%	1%	two%	85%
Starting time examination at 30 daysxi	Ane-twelvemonth follow-up AIS course
A	95%	0	2,5%	2,v%
B	0	53%	21%	26%
C	i%	0	45%	54%
D	2%	0	0	96%

Table 2

Prediction of functional walking according to AIS harm and other features.

AIS/lesion level at access	Functional walking/authors (references)
AIS A/cervical lesion	0% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	0% (Ditunno et al., 2008b)
AIS A/thoracic and lumbar lesions	five% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	8.5% (Ditunno et al., 2008b)
AIS at admission and sensation	% recovery of customs ambulation at 1 year post-injury/authors (references)
AIS B (only lite touch preservation)	0% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	eleven% (Crozier et al., 1991)
	33% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
AIS B (light bear on + pin prick preservation)	89% (Crozier et al., 1991)
	66% (Foo et al., 1981)
	75% (Katoh and el Masry, 1995)
AIS at access and historic period	% recovery of community ambulation at ane year post-injury/authors (references)
AIS C < 50 years	91% (Burns et al., 1997)
	71% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS C > fifty years	42% (Burns et al., 1997)
	25% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS D < 50 years	100% (Burns et al., 1997)
	100% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS D > 50 years	100% (Burns et al., 1997)
	eighty% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)

AIS course B patients (those with motor complete, sensory incomplete lesion at 72 h test) commonly bear witness some motor recovery and they tin catechumen to AIS C or even AIS D grade. However, the overall recovery of ambulation is considered to be nearly 33% (Katoh and el Masry, 1995; van Middendorp et al., 2009). The percentage of walking recovery may vary depending on the modality of the sensation spared at the lowest sacral segments. Several studies reported a relationship between pinprick preservation and recovery in AIS B patients. AIS grade B patients with pinprick preservation have a amend walking recovery than those with light touch only (Foo et al., 1981; Crozier et al., 1991; Waters et al., 1994a; Katoh and el Masry, 1995; Oleson et al., 2005) (Table ​ 2). This finding has an anatomical footing at the spinal cord level. The preservation of pinprick perception together with calorie-free bear on one indicates less extensive damage to the spino-thalamic tracts and posterior column. Therefore, in these cases, there is a loftier likelihood of some sparing of the motor pathways conveyed by the nearby cortico-spinal tracts (Oleson et al., 2005).

Motor incomplete (AIS C) patients have a meliorate prognosis for walking recovery than sensory incomplete ones. The overall rate of recovery is about 75% (Maynard et al., 1979; Crozier et al., 1992; Waters et al., 1994b; van Middendorp et al., 2009). This percentage includes both the patients who converted to AIS D and those who remained AIS C only achieve at to the lowest degree some walking function (van Middendorp et al., 2009); these patients probably have low thoracic or lumbar lesions and walk with braces and devices. Several factors may influence the hazard of walking recovery in these patients: lower extremity strength, motor recovery timing, age and upper extremity strength for tetraplegic patients are the most important ones (Crozier et al., 1992; Waters et al., 1994b). In AIS C patients age seems to be a strong prognostic gene for walking recovery. Age represents a clear negative prognostic gene for walking recovery: AIS C subjects younger than 50 years take a chance of achieving functional walking of 80–90%, but this percentage dramatically decreases to 30–40% in older patients (Table ​ 2) (Perot and Vera, 1982; Foo, 1986; Burns et al., 1997; Scivoletto et al., 2003). Unlike hypotheses take been offered to explain the negative effect of age. The functional potential for a given neurological arrears is lower at older historic period; this may be considered reasonable since functional abilities more often than not turn down as people's age increases. In normal ageing "reserve (summit) capacity" (or "vitality") (DiGiovanna, 2000) seems to peak at around 30 years of historic period, and so gradually declines until death. Affliction processes, including SCI and its complications, are considered to advance this process of decline. Jakob et al. (2009) offers another possible caption. In his report he found that historic period is not correlated with neurologic recovery, just is correlated with a worse functional event in terms of independence in daily life activities and walking part. He therefore suggested that the neurological recovery is non directly related to the functional outcome and that elderly patients accept difficulties in translating neurological recovery into positive functional changes.

Finally, AIS D patients at admission have very skillful ambulation prognosis at 1 year mail service-injury (Burns et al., 1997; Scivoletto et al., 2003). All patients, regardless of age, who initially were classified every bit AIS D (within 72 h) were able to walk at the fourth dimension of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (Burns et al., 1997; van Middendorp et al., 2009).

Other clinical factors

In addition to AIS grade, several other factors evaluated at 72 h afterwards the lesion take been considered in the prognosis of walking recovery and are examined below.

Reflexes

In the very early examination of SCI patients the presence/absence of the delayed plantar response (DPR) must exist assessed. DPR is characterized by a delayed response to an unusually strong stimulus to the sole of the foot (Weinstein et al., 1997). The onset of this response following the stimulus could exist 500 ms or a total second following the initiation of the stimulus (Weinstein et al., 1997). The DPR shows a reciprocal relationship with the Babinski sign and information technology is peculiarly relevant because it allows the prognosis during the spinal shock phase (Ko et al., 1999). The DPR is a negative prognostic indicator as it is more often present and lasts longer (more than 1 day) in SCI patients who do not recover whatsoever voluntary motility (Weinstein et al., 1997; Ko et al., 1999).

Syndromes

Based on the distribution of sensory and motor loss, the ISNCSCI allow to identify several incomplete spinal cord syndromes with dissimilar prognostic values.

The central string syndrome (CCS) is by and large seen following cervical lesion. It represents about ix% of the total SCIs and 44% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007) and is characterized past a greater interest of the upper extremities than the lower extremities. The CCS is a clinical picture that recognizes several causes (with and without os injury) and several different mechanisms (including direct injury of the spinal string or vascular injuries) (McKinley et al., 2007) that primarily affects the center of the spinal cord and generally has a favorable prognosis as to independence in daily life activities and bladder and bowel function recovery (Newey et al., 2000; Dvorak et al., 2005; Aito et al., 2006). Because of the lesser involvement of the lower extremities, CCS is considered to have a expert prognosis for walking recovery too (Merriam et al., 1986; Penrod et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1990; Burns et al., 1997; Aito et al., 2006). The percentage of patients who recover walking varies from 40 to 97%, merely is strongly influenced by age. Several studies confirm that younger patients (less than 50 years old) have twice the chance of achieving independent walking than older ones (Foo, 1986; Merriam et al., 1986; Penrod et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1990; Burns et al., 1997; Newey et al., 2000; Dvorak et al., 2005; Aito et al., 2006).

The Brown-Séquard syndrome (BSS) is characterized by ipsilateral hemiplegia and contralateral hemianalgesia due to spinal hemisection (Brown-Sequard, 1868). It accounts for 2–4% of all traumatic SCIs and 17% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007). The pure form of BSS is rarely seen and the Brown-Séquard Plus Syndrome (relative ipsilateral hemiplegia with a relative contralateral hemianalgesia) is much more frequent (Roth et al., 1991). BSS is more frequent at cervical level and is commonly associated with stab-wound injuries (Admirer and Harrington, 1984). BSS is characterized by a good functional prognosis. Nearly 75% of patients reach independent walking at discharge from rehabilitation (Stahlman and Hanley, 1992). In this framework an important predictor for walking recovery is the distribution of the impairment: if the upper limb is weaker than the lower limb, then patients are more probable to ambulate at discharge (Kirshblum and O'Connor, 1998).

The anterior cord syndrome is due to a lesion that involves the anterior two thirds of the spinal cord and preserves the posterior columns (Maynard et al., 1997), and account for i% of all the SCIs and 5% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007). It may derive from a retropulsed disc or bone fragments (Bauer and Errico, 1991), direct injury to the inductive spinal cord, or with lesions of the anterior spinal artery that provides the blood supply to that tract of spinal cord (Cheshire et al., 1996). Lesions of the anterior spinal artery may consequence from diseases of the aorta, cardiac or aortic surgery, embolism, polyarteritis nodosa, or angioplasty (Cheshire et al., 1996). Anterior cord syndrome is characterized by a variable loss of motor as well as pinprick sensation with a relative preservation of light bear upon, proprioception, and deep-pressure sensation. Due to the massive involvement of the inductive and lateral spinal cord with inclusion of the cortico-spinal tracts, only ten–20% of the patients with an inductive string syndrome accept the chance to recover muscle office, and even in those with some recovery, unremarkably motor strength is low and coordination is lacking; consequently these patients have low walking recovery chances (Bohlman, 1979).

Etiology of the lesion

Nigh of the literature on SCI is focused on the rehabilitation of traumatic patients, despite the relevant incidence of not-traumatic lesions, considered to business relationship for a percentage of the total SCIs varying from 30 to 80% (Buchan et al., 1972; Celani et al., 2001; Citterio et al., 2004). Patients with non-traumatic lesions differ from their traumatic counterparts for several prognostic factors. They are usually older, with a more even distribution of genders and a higher frequency of incomplete lesions. Therefore, a direct comparison of these 2 populations is difficult (Scivoletto et al., 2011). Notwithstanding, when the misreckoning effect of these factors is eliminated past means of statistics, patients with non-traumatic spinal cord lesions tin achieve comparable rates of functional gains as their traumatic spinal cord injury counterparts (McKinley et al., 2000, 2001; Mckinley et al., 2002). With regard to walking role, recently a number of articles compared the recovery of airing in traumatic and non-traumatic SCIs and found that the two populations accomplish comparable walking chapters with an overall percentage of patients varying from 35 (Scivoletto et al., 2011) to 49% (Marinho et al., 2012).

Gender

There are only few studies on gender related differences in neurological and functional outcomes later inpatient rehabilitation of SCI (Greenwald et al., 2001; Scivoletto et al., 2004b; Sipski et al., 2004). Two of them (Greenwald et al., 2001; Scivoletto et al., 2004b) found no meaning differences betwixt the two genders with regard to daily life independence, motor efficiency, American Spinal Injury Association motor scores (Greenwald et al., 2001) and walking function (Scivoletto et al., 2004b). However, Sipski et al. (2004) found gender-related differences in daily life independence, just did not specifically focus on walking recovery. Women with SCI may accept more than natural neurologic recovery than men, just, for a given level and degree of neurologic injury, men tend to do better functionally than women at time of discharge from rehabilitation (Sipski et al., 2004).

Formulas and algorithms

In the last iii decades several attempts have been made to link one or more of the above mentioned factors (and of the results of instrumental examinations discussed beneath) to the prognosis for walking recovery.

Waters et al. (1994b) examined the relationship between lower extremity strength at first test in incomplete paraplegics and walking recovery: all patients with an initial (ane-month) lower extremity motor score of ≥10 points ambulated in 1 year. Seventy percent of patients with an initial motor score between 1 and 9 ambulated at i yr. Furthermore, all patients with an initial hip flexor or human knee extensor Course ≥2 ambulated in the community at 1 twelvemonth.

The same writer examined the odds of walking recovery in incomplete tetraplegics and found that, although the relationship betwixt initial lower extremity motor score and walking holds truthful for tetraplegics, these patients have less chance to achieve ambulation (Waters et al., 1994a): 63% of the patients with an initial lower extremity motor score of ≥10 points ambulated past 1 year, vs. 21% of those with an initial motor score between one and 9 (Waters et al., 1994a). In addition, Waters stressed the relationship betwixt upper extremities strength and ambulation recovery in tetraplegics: patients who are customs or household ambulators have significant higher motor scores. The author linked this datum to the importance of upper extremities force for devices employ during walking (Waters et al., 1994a).

Crozier et al. (1992) focused on the timing of recovery of lower extremity motor strength and concluded that early recovery of quadriceps strength is an excellent prognostic gene for airing. All patients with an initial quadriceps strength of at least Grade 2/5 who attained a grade of ≥three/v in at least one quadriceps past two months post-injury achieved functional airing (ability to walk independently in the customs, with or without the utilise of devices and braces) at follow-upwards. However, only 25% of those who did not recover quadriceps strength of three/v within ii months were able to walk at follow-upward.

More than recently, Zörner et al. (2010) developed an algorithm based on outcome predictors and aimed at identifying subgroups of patients in the sub-acute stage who could achieve functional walking. For patients with incomplete paraplegia, lower extremity motor scores, pinprick scores and age were the best predictors for walking recovery. For patients with incomplete tetraplegia the more reliable predictors were the lower extremity motor scores, the tibial SSEP score and the AIS class.

In 2011 van Middendorp et al. (2011) produced a simple clinical prediction rule based on the combination of age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), motor scores of the quadriceps femoris (L3), gastrocsoleus (S1) muscles, and lite touch awareness of dermatomes L3 and S1. This rule showed an excellent discrimination chapters in recognizing patients who accomplished contained ambulation (ability to walk independently, with or without braces and orthoses for <10 thousand) at follow-up from those who were dependent walkers or non-walkers.

Instrumental exam

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) (Table ​ 3)

Table 3

Prognostic value of SSEPs and MEPs.

	Vi months walking capacity
	Normal (%)	Functional (%)	Therapeutic (%)	No walking (%)
LOWER LIMBS SSEPS AND Airing (Curt and Dietz, 1997)
Intial SSEP evaluation
Normal	83	17	0	0
Nowadays, altered	x	60	10	20
Absent	0	7	thirteen	eighty
LOWER LIMBS MEP AND Airing (Curt et al., 1998)
Intial MEP evaluation
Normal	100	0	0	0
Absent-minded	11	0	78

SSEPs are used for clinical diagnosis in patients with neurologic disease, and many studies have been performed to decide the value of SSEPs in the prediction of walking recovery in SCI patients (Immature and Dexter, 1979; Kaplan and Rosen, 1981; Young, 1985; Foo, 1986; Ziganow, 1986; Katz et al., 1991; Aalfs et al., 1993; Jacobs et al., 1995; Curt and Dietz, 1997).

Most of these studies conclude that early SSEPs can predict motor improvement and ambulation outcome in SCI patients. However, SSEPs practise not seem to offer additional prognostic accuracy if compared to clinical examination according to the ISNCSCI for both complete and incomplete patients (Young and Dexter, 1979; Kaplan and Rosen, 1981; Perot and Vera, 1982; Chabot et al., 1985; Katz et al., 1991; Aalfs et al., 1993; Curt and Dietz, 1997).

When a reliable clinical examination, together with the ISNCSCI is impossible (patients unresponsive, for instance because sedated or under the effect of booze or drugs, or uncooperative, for case because of hurting) then SSEPs are helpful to determine if they have SCI (Curt and Dietz, 1997). In improver, SSEPs may exist helpful to differentiate betwixt SCI and hysteric paraplegia, a differential diagnosis that may be very difficult (Kaplan et al., 1985).

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (Table ​ 3)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation allows an exam of the conductivity of the motor tracts following cortical or spinal lesions in humans. According to a study of Curt, MEPs can contribute toward diagnosing lesions of different neurologic structures within the spinal cord and in predicting the recovery of functional movements (Brusk et al., 1998). The study shows that MEPs recordings are sensitive to indicate motor tract lesions in approximately ninety% of SCI patients and predictive for the recovery of upper and lower limb motor office. In this sense they are of like prognostic value to clinical exam in the prediction of functional recovery. MEPs tin can be used in combination with the ASIA protocol to follow the recovery of clinical motor functions in relation to that of descending motor tracts for impulse transmission. In Curt's study, MEPs were highly predictive of ambulatory capacity. All patients with elicitable MEPs at initial exam recovered a muscle strength of 3/five or more of the respective muscles. Not surprisingly, MEPs recordings in SCI patients are more sensitive than SSEPs recordings for revealing the involvement of motor tract fibers and are at least as sensitive as the ASIA protocol in predicting the resulting functional arrears. Similarly to SSEPs, the use of MEP recordings is by and large advisable in patients who are uncooperative (approximately xv% of patients with astute SCI) (Bozzo et al., 2011).

Magnetic resonance imaging (Table ​ four)

Table iv

MRI and lesion severity.

Authors	Results
PRESENCE OF HEMORRHAGE AT INITIAL Test
Marciello et al., 1993	Hemorrage = low upper extremity and no lower extremity recovery
Flanders et al., 1990	Hemorrage = decreased motor power, lower motor recovery rate, and fewer muscles with useful role
Ramón et al., 1997	Hemorrage = consummate injury
SIZE OF HEMORRHAGE
Boldin et al., 2006;
Flanders et al., 1990;	Small hemorrhage = higher recovery rates
Schaefer et al., 1992
Bondurant et al., 1990;	No relationship betwixt hemorrhage size and recovery
Flanders et al., 1996
PRESENCE OF EDEMA
Flanders et al., 1996	Edema = prognosis of recovery to functional levels (D/E)
Ramón et al., 1997	Edema = association with incomplete syndromes
SIZE OF EDEMA
Flemish region et al., 1990;	Degree of edema is inversely proportional to initial impairment and future recovery
Flanders et al., 1996;
Ramón et al., 1997
Boldin et al., 2006; Flemish region et al., 1990	Multiple levels involvement = poorer prognosis and greater chance of complete lesions
Flanders et al., 1996	Interest of only one to three segments = improved prognosis

Before the advent of MRI, there were no imaging methods to assess the severity of traumatic SCI. MRI provides a rapid non-invasive means of evaluating the condition of spinal string parenchyma and depicting the injured spinal string and accurately showing the extent of macroscopic damage (Yamashita et al., 1991). It should exist noted, withal, that to the all-time of our knowledge, no report examined the relationship between MRI aspect and walking recovery, but only with neurologic recovery (AIS class conversion) that is just partially related to walking (see above).

For prognostic purposes the T2 sagittal images seem to be the most useful ones, while T1 and centric images do not correlate with the prognosis (Bozzo et al., 2011). A damaged spinal string exhibits a variable amount of intramedullary hemorrhage and edema. Both the presence of these ii features and the corporeality of parenchyma that is affected by hemorrhage and edema are directly related to the degree of initial neurologic deficit and to the prognosis (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flanders et al., 1990). Based on these aspects, Bondurant and associates (Bondurant et al., 1990) proposed a nomenclature which consider four different MRI patterns: Pattern one shows a normal MRI point in the string; pattern ii represents unmarried-level edema; pattern 3 is multi-level edema; and pattern 4 is mixed hemorrhage and edema.

Most studies showed that patients with spinal cord hemorrhage volition take decreased motor power, lower motor recovery rates, and fewer muscles with useful role, i year afterward injury in comparison with subjects with minor, not-hemorrhagic lesions (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flanders et al., 1990, 1996; Yamashita et al., 1991; Schaefer et al., 1992; Marciello et al., 1993; Sato et al., 1994; Ramón et al., 1997); hemorrhage on initial MRI (within 15 days from the lesion) is associated with a complete injury in almost 100% of the patients (Ramón et al., 1997). If no hemorrhage is seen on initial MRI, patients will accept an incomplete lesion and have a significantly better prognosis for motor recovery in the upper and lower extremities, besides equally comeback in their Frankel and/or ASIA impairment scale nomenclature (Schaefer et al., 1992).

It is unclear whether the size of the hemorrhage is a prognostic feature. Some authors (Flemish region et al., 1990; Schaefer et al., 1992; Boldin et al., 2006) take shown that small hemorrhages may offer higher recovery rates; others showed no difference based on the size of the hemorrhage (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flanders et al., 1996).

With regard to spinal string edema, this MRI finding seems to take a skillful prognostic value. In incomplete SCIs, the finding of edema in MRI is associated with a skillful prognosis of neurological recovery (Flanders et al., 1996). Furthermore, the incomplete syndromes, such as the Brown-Sèquard syndrome, seem to be associated with the edema blueprint (Ramón et al., 1997). Notwithstanding, if the edema involves multiple levels, it tends to be associated with a poorer prognosis and a greater adventure of having a complete lesion (Flanders et al., 1996; Boldin et al., 2006). If the cord edema is limited to one to three segments only, so the lesion is usually milder in nature, with an improved prognosis (Bauer and Errico, 1991).

Based on the classification of Bondurant et al. (1990), Bozzo et al. (2011) reviewed the data of several articles (Schaefer et al., 1992; Shimada and Tokioka, 1999; Andreoli et al., 2005) and found a correlation with the AIS conversion of patients. Every bit already reported hemorrhage is the more astringent MRI aspect, with about 95% of patients remaining with the same AIS course of admission test. Patients with diffuse edema also showed a poor improvement, as only 28% of them showed an improvement of AIS grade. Conversely, patients with unmarried level edema pattern showed a good neurological outcome equally 90% of them improved for a mean of i.9 AIS grades.

Other positive correlations have been described: greater caste of cord compression, greater degree of canal compromise, and the severity of soft tissue injuries seem to be all associated with poorer neurological outcomes (Flanders et al., 1996; Selden et al., 1999; Dai and Jia, 2000; Miyanji et al., 2007; Song et al., 2008).

Handling

In the last decade several interventions aiming at reducing the spinal cord impairment (neuroprotection) accept been proposed (Becker and McDonald, 2012). However, these interventions are withal at an experimental level (Becker and McDonald, 2012). Therefore, in the following paragraphs we volition focus merely on the use and efficacy of high dose methylprednisolone (which, although questioned, is yet the most widely used pharmacological treatment in the acute phase of SCI) and of early on surgical intervention. Information technology should be noticed that in both cases, studies referred to neurological improvement rather than to walking recovery. Therefore, information on the efficacy of these treatments on ambulation are not bachelor.

Methylprednisolone

The assistants of loftier-dose methylprednisolone (MP) to patients with spinal cord injuries has been reported in the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (NASCIS, NASCIS-II, and NASCIS-Three) (Bracken et al., 1984, 1990, 1997). Since then, the employ of MP increased and became a standard of care for acute traumatic SCIs (Hurlbert, 2001). It has been hypothesized that MP attenuates the inflammatory cascade and lessens lipid peroxidation, thus decreasing secondary Spinal Cord damage (Delamarter et al., 1995). In the NASCIS studies, the 24 and 48 h administration of high dose MP produced an important neurologic recovery (AIS grade improvement) paralleled past a functional amelioration (Bracken et al., 1997). However, several recent revisions of NASCIS protocols and other randomized trials questioned the efficacy of steroids assistants to achieve a neurologic comeback (Hurlbert, 2001; Matsumoto et al., 2001; Suberviola et al., 2008; Bydon et al., 2013). Furthermore, the 48-h–infusion of MP seems to exist associated with an increased risk of pneumonia, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and steroid myopathy (Pointillart et al., 2000; Quian et al., 2004).

Based on these evidences, both the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine clinical exercise guidelines (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 2007) and the neurosurgical guidelines (2002) consider the use of high-dose MP to be a treatment option rather than a standard.

Surgery trials

The undisputed benefits of surgical treatment for unstable vertebral injuries include decreased hospital stay, fewer sequelae from prolonged immobilization, and more rapid admission to the rehabilitation system (Raineteau and Schwab, 2001).

Despite these evidence, the timing of decompression of the neural elements, and, in particular, the efficacy of early decompression (inside 24 h) in improving neurologic recovery is still a matter of debate (Fehlings and Tator, 1999; Fehlings and Perrin, 2005). A meta-assay of studies of early decompression from 1966 through 2000 (La Rosa et al., 2004), showed that surgery performed within 24 h produced a meaning improvement in neurological recovery compared with late surgery, but concluded that the testify was non strong and that early surgery could be considered merely every bit a practice option.

Starting from this framework, a recent prospective multicentric report (Fehlings et al., 2012) demonstrated that the odds of achieving a 2 AIS grade comeback is ii.8 times higher in patients undergoing early surgical decompression (within 24 h). Nonetheless, a recent meta-analysis (van Middendorp et al., 2013) reported a lack of statistical robustness of the articles examined, therefore the relationship between early surgery and ameliorate neurological outcome is however to be demonstrated.

Discussion

This review demonstrates that the run a risk of walking recovery later on a SCI can be accurately predicted on the base of demographic data and clinical examination. Patients with consummate sensory-motor lesions have very limited possibility of achieving walking role at follow up, and besides if they are able to ambulate they usually are "limited ambulators." The chances of walking recovery improve in less severe lesions, as demonstrated by AIS B and C subjects. AIS B patients tin recover walking especially if their clinical picture shows a less severe interest of the spinal cord (low-cal touch and pinprick conservation = some sparing of the spino-thalamic and posterior columns tracts = higher possibility of cortico-spinal tracts preservation). Finally, subjects with AIS C lesions are bound to walk, specially the younger ones. This prognosis for walking may be sustained and empowered by instrumental examinations that help to assess the severity of the lesion and, in some cases (SSEPs and MEPs) are directly correlated with walking function.

The need to predict consequence based on expected neurological recovery and associated functional recovery has been emphasized as essential for health care planning (Ditunno, 1999) and this demand is partially unmet.

During the first few days after SCI, definitive management strategies are formulated, which oftentimes include aggressive surgical decompression of the spinal string (Wilson et al., 2012). This is also the fourth dimension of greatest ache for an injured patient and their family as they face significant prognostic uncertainty. A precise knowledge of the prognosis makes information technology possible to respond questions regarding part that patients usually ask later spinal string injury: "Volition I walk again?" and "What will I be able to practise?" Furthermore, in countries with wellness care systems based on insurance, rehabilitation professionals have to justify and fight for appropriate services; furthermore they have to know how to allocate resources. Therefore, predicting recovery has go a rehabilitative imperative (Ditunno, 1999).

Finally, better cognition of the grade and prognosis of recovery afterward SCI and an agreement of the underlying mechanisms would help in the development of strategies and treatments to heighten neurological recovery. The number of interventions, therapies, and devices that take been developed and proposed to improve functional outcomes after SCI is enormous; several of these proposal volition undergo clinical trials in the near future. Some early stage SCI clinical trials accept recently been started and some experimental therapies have been introduced into clinical practice without a clinical trial being completed. Prognostic data are essential to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs and therapies (for instance to distinguish between the natural recovery and the effect of treatments) and to project the clinical trials (for case to summate the number of patients needed to obtain statistical power) (Fawcett et al., 2006).

Limitations

This article has several limitations due to the nature of the works examined. Some of them are based on pocket-size sample sizes and the definition of walking function and of follow upwards time points vary beyond the studies. Furthermore, these articles mainly represent the experience from United states of america and, in part, Europe. Therefore, they do not reverberate the whole world standards of care. Equally SCI management may differ in unlike geographical areas, the rates of recovery of walking could vary to. Finally, the distribution in fourth dimension of the works examined is not regular. Although the study of the prognostic factors is however a affair of involvement, most of the articles related to clinical factors date dorsum to the eighty due south and 90 south. Some prognostic factors may alter over fourth dimension as SCI management evolves. Based on these limitations the results of these studies could not exist necessarily generalizable However, the factors that we examined here are still considered the base of the prognosis of SCI outcome (Burns et al., 2012).

Funding

Supported in part by grant RC12G of the Italian Ministry of Health and grant P133 of the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia to Giorgio Scivoletto.

Conflict of involvement statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of whatsoever commercial or financial relationships that could exist construed as a potential conflict of involvement.

References

• (2002). Direction of acute central cervical spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery l(3 Suppl), S166–S172 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Aalfs C. M., Koelman J. H., Meyjes F. E., de Visser B. W. O. (1993). Posterior tibial and sural nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: a study in spastic paraparesis in spinal cord lesions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89, 437–441 ten.1016/0168-5597(93)90118-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Aito Due south., D'Andrea Thou., Werhagen L., Farsetti L., Cappelli S., Bandini B., et al. (2006). Neurological and functional outcome in traumatic fundamental cord syndrome. Spinal Cord 45, 292–297 10.1038/sj.sc.3101944 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• American Spinal Injury Association. (2000). International standards for neurological classifications of spinal cord Injury (revised). Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association [Google Scholar]
• Andreoli C., Colaiacomo M. C., Rojas Beccaglia M., Di Biasi C., Casciani E., Gualdi G. (2005). MRI in the acute phase of spinal string traumatic lesions: Human relationship betwixt MRI findings and neurological result. Radiol. Med. 110, 636–645 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Bauer R. D., Errico T. J. (1991). Cervical spine injuries, in Spinal Trauma, eds Errico T. J., Bauer R. D., Waugh T. (Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; ), 71–121 [Google Scholar]
• Becker D., McDonald J. Westward., 3rd. (2012). Approaches to repairing the damaged spinal cord: overview. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 445–461 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-eight.00028-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bohlman H. H. (1979). Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 61, 1119–1142 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Boldin C., Raith J., Fankhauser F., Haunschmid C., Schwantzer 1000., Schweighofer F. (2006). Predicting neurologic recovery in cervical spinal string injury with postoperative MR imaging. Spine 31, 554–559 10.1097/01.brs.0000201274.59427.a4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bondurant F. J., Cotler H. B., Kulkarni M. V., McArdle C. B., Harris J. H. (1990). Acute spinal string injury: a written report using physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 15, 161–168 10.1097/00007632-199003000-00002 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bozzo A., Marcoux J., Radhakrishna G., Pelletier J., Goulet B. (2011). The function of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 28, 1401–1411 x.1089/neu.2009.1236 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken M. B., Collins West. F., Freeman D. F., Shepard Thou. J., Wagner F. W., Silten R. Grand., et al. (1984). Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal string injury. JAMA 251, 45–52 ten.1001/jama.1984.03340250025015 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken K. B., Shepard M. J., Collins W. F., Holford T. R., Immature West., Baskin D. South., et al. (1990). A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the handling of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the 2nd national acute spinal cord injury study. N. Engl. J. Med. 322, 1405–1411 10.1056/NEJM199005173222001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken Thou. B., Shepard One thousand. J., Holford T. R., Leo-Summers L., Aldrich E. F., Fazl M., et al. (1997). Assistants of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the third national acute spinal cord injury randomized controlled trial. national acute spinal cord injury study. JAMA 277, 1597–1604 10.1001/jama.1997.03540440031029 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Brown-Sequard C. E. (1868). Lectures on the physiology and pathology of the central nervous organization and the treatment of organic nervous angel. Lancet 2, 593–595, 659–662, 755–757, 821–823. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)52465-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Buchan A. C., Fulford Thou. Due east., Jellineck East., Kerr West. Thousand., Newsam J. Eastward., Stark G. D. (1972). A preliminary survey of the incidence and etiology of spinal paralysis. Paraplegia ten, 23–28 10.1038/sc.1972.five [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Burns A. S., Marino R. J., Flemish region A. E., Flett H. (2012). Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 47–62 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Burns S. P., Golding D. Thousand., Rolle W. A., Jr., Graziani Five., Ditunno J. F. (1997). Recovery of airing in motor incomplete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, 1169–1172 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90326-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bydon Yard., Lin J., Macki G., Gokaslan Z. Fifty., Bydon A. (2013). The current role of steroids in acute spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.062 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Celani M. G., Spizzichino L., Ricci S., Zampolini 1000., Franceschini M. (2001). Spinal cord injury in Italy: a multicenter retrospective written report. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 82, 589–596 10.1053/apmr.2001.21948 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Chabot R., York D. H., Watts C., Waugh W. A. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potentials evaluated in normal subjects in spinal cord injured patients. J. Neurosurg. 63, 544–551 10.3171/jns.1985.63.iv.0544 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Cheshire Due west. Eastward., Santos C. C., Massey E. Westward., Howard J. East. (1996). Spinal string infarction: etiology and outcome. Neurology 47, 321–330 x.1212/WNL.47.2.321 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Citterio A., Franceschini M., Spizzichino 50., Reggio A., Rossi B., Stampacchia G. (2004). Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1483–1487 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.028 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. (2007). Early on Acute Management in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: a Clinical Practice Guideline for Health-Intendance Providers. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America [Google Scholar]
• Crozier K. S., Cheng 50. L., Graziani V., Zorn G., Herbison M., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1992). Spinal string injury: prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery. Paraplegia thirty, 762–767 10.1038/sc.1992.147 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Crozier Chiliad. S., Graziani 5., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Herbison Chiliad. J. (1991). Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on sensory exam in patients who are initially motor consummate. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 72, 119–121 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Brusque A., Dietz V. (1997). Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocols in predicting outcome. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, 39–43 x.1016/S0003-9993(97)90007-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Short A., Keck M. Due east., Dietz V. (1998). Functional result following spinal cord injury: significance of motor-evoked potentials and ASIA scores. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 81–86 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Dai L., Jia 50. (2000). Central cord injury complicating acute cervical disc herniation in trauma. Spine 25, 331–335 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Delamarter R. B., Sherman J., Carr J. B. (1995). Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury: recovery after immediate and delayed compression. J. Os Joint Surg. Am. 77, 1042–1049 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• DiGiovanna A. Thou. (2000). Human Ageing: Biological Perspectives, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: McGraw Loma Companies [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno J. F. (1999). The John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Predicting recovery afterward spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation imperative. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. eighty, 361–364 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno J. F., Scivoletto Grand., Patrick Grand., Biering-Sorensen F., Abel R., Marino R. (2008b). Validation of the walking index for spinal cord injury in a Usa and European clinical population. Spinal Cord 46, 181–188 10.1038/sj.sc.3102071 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno P. 50., Patrick M., Stineman Yard., Ditunno J. F. (2008a). Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional written report. Spinal Cord. 46, 500–506 x.1038/sj.sc.3102172 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Domingo A., Al-Yahya A. A., Asiri Y., Eng J. J., Tania Lam T., Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. (2012). A systematic review of the effects of pharmacological agents on walking function in people with spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 29, 865–879 10.1089/neu.2011.2052 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Dvorak M. F., Fisher C. G., Hoekema J., Boyd Thou., Noonan V., Wing P. C., et al. (2005). Factors Predicting motor recovery and functional outcome later traumatic central cord syndrome a long-term follow-up. Spine 30, 2303–2311 10.1097/01.brs.0000182304.35949.11 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fawcett J. W., Curt A., Steeves J. D., Coleman W. P., Tuszynski 1000. H., Lammertse D., et al. (2006). Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal string injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord 45, 190–205 10.1038/sj.sc.3102007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings M. G., Perrin R. Thousand. (2005). The function and timing of early decompression for cervical spine injury: update with a review of the recent clinical evidence. Injury 36(Suppl. two), B13–B26 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.011 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings M. G., Tator C. H. (1999). An evidence-based review of decompressive surgery in astute spinal cord injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies. J. Neurosurg. Spine 91, 1–xi ten.3171/spi.1999.91.ane.0001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings M. Thousand., Vaccaro A., Wilson J. R., Singh A. W., Cadotte D., Harrop J. South., et al. (2012). Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS ONE 7:e32037 10.1371/periodical.pone.0032037 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Flanders A. Due east., Schaefer D. Grand., Doan H. T., Mishkin M. Grand., Gonzalez C. F., Northrup B. E. (1990). Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 177, 25–33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Flanders A. E., Spettell C. G., Tartaglino L. K., Friedman D. P., Herbison G. J. (1996). Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology 201, 649–655 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Foo D. (1986). Spinal cord injury in forty-four patients with cervical spondylosis. Paraplegia 24, 301–306 10.1038/sc.1986.42 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Foo D., Subrahmanyan T. Due south., Rossier A. B. (1981). Post-traumatic astute anterior spinal cord syndrome. Paraplegia. 19, 201–205 10.1038/sc.1981.42 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Gentleman D., Harrington M. (1984). Penetrating injury of the spinal cord. Injury xvi, 7–8 ten.1016/0020-1383(84)90101-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Greenwald B. D., Seel R. T., Cifu D. X., Shah A. Northward. (2001). Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 1181–1187 10.1053/apmr.2001.24891 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Herbison One thousand. J., Zerby S. A., Cohen M. E., Marino R. J., Ditunno J. E. (1991). Motor power difference within the first ii weeks post-SCI in cervical spinal cord quadriplegic subjects. J. Neurotrauma ix, 373–380 10.1089/neu.1992.ix.373 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hurlbert R. J. (2001). The role of steroids in acute spinal string injury. An evidence-based analysis. Spine 26, S39–S46 x.1097/00007632-200112151-00009 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hussey R. W., Stauffer E. S. (1973). Spinal string injury: requirements for airing. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 54, 544–547 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Jacobs Southward. R., Yeaney N. Grand., Herbison G. J., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1995). Future ambulation prognosis every bit predicted past somatosensory evoked potentials in motor complete and incomplete quadriplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76, 635–641 ten.1016/S0003-9993(95)80632-six [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Jakob West., Wirz M., van Hedel H. J., Dietz V., EM-SCI Study Group. (2009). Difficulty of elderly SCI subjects to interpret motor recovery—"body function"–into daily living activities. J. Neurotrauma 26, 2037–2044 10.1089/neu.2008.0824 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kaplan B. J., Friedman W. A., Gavenstein D. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potential in hysterical paraplegia. Surg. Neurol. 23, 502–506 ten.1016/0090-3019(85)90246-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kaplan P. Due east., Rosen J. S. (1981). Somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia 19, 118–122 10.1038/sc.1981.26 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Katoh S., el Masry W. Due south. (1995). Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 33, 506–509 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Katz R. T., Tolkeikis R. J., Knuth A. Eastward. (1991). Somatosensory-evoked and dermatomal-evoked potentials are not clinically useful in the prognostication of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 16, 730–735 10.1097/00007632-199107000-00007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kirshblum S. C., O'Connor Grand. C. (1998). Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 1456–1466 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ko H-Y., Ditunno J. F., Graziani V., Trivial J. West. (1999). The blueprint of reflex recovery during spinal shock. Spinal Cord 37, 402–409 10.1038/sj.sc.3100840 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• La Rosa G., Conti A., Cardali South., Cacciola F., Tomasello F. (2004). Does early decompression improve neurological result of spinal string injured patients? Appraisement of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord 42, 503–512 10.1038/sj.sc.3101627 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Marciello One thousand., Flanders A. E., Herbison Yard. J., Schaefer D. M., Friedman D. P., Lane J. I. (1993). Magnetic resonance imaging related to neurologic result in cervical spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74, 940–946 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Marinho A. R., Flett H. G., Craven C., Ottensmeyer C. A., Parsons D., Verrier One thousand. C. (2012). Walking-related outcomes for individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury inform physical therapy practice. J. Spinal Cord Med. 35, 371–381 ten.1179/2045772312Y.0000000038 [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Matsumoto T., Tamaki T., Kawakami Grand., Yoshida M., Ando Thousand., Yamada H. (2001). Early complications of high-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate handling in the follow-up of astute cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 26, 426–430 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00020 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Maynard F. K., Glen 1000. R., Fountain South., Wilmot C., Hamilton R. (1979). Neurological prognosis subsequently traumatic quadriplegia. J. Neurosurg. 50, 611–616 x.3171/jns.1979.l.5.0611 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Maynard F. M., Jr., Bracken Thousand. B., Creasey G., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Donovan Due west. H., Ducker T. B., et al. (1997). International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal string injury patients (revised). Spinal Cord 35, 266–274 10.1038/sj.sc.3100432 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley Due west., Santos Thousand., Meade M., Brooke K. (2007). Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes. J. Spinal Cord Med. 30, 215–224 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W. O., Huang M. E., Tewksbury M. A. (2000). Neoplastic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: an inpatient rehabilitation comparison. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 138–144 x.1097/00002060-200003000-00005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W. O., Seel R. T., Gadi R. K., Tewksbury M. A. (2001). Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehab. fourscore, 693–699 10.1097/00002060-200109000-00010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mckinley W. O., Tewksbury M. A., Mujteba Due north. M. (2002). Spinal stenosis vs traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. J. Spinal Cord Med. 25, 28–32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Merriam Due west. E., Taylor T. K. F., Ruff Due south. J., McPhail M. J. (1986). A reappraisal of acute traumatic central string syndrome. J. Os Joint Surg. 68B, 708–713 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Miyanji F., Furlan J. C., Aarabi B., Arnold P. 1000., Fehlings Chiliad. Chiliad. (2007). Astute cervical traumatic spinal string injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology 243, 820–827 10.1148/radiol.2433060583 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Newey G. Fifty., Sen P. K., Fraser R. D. (2000). The long-term upshot after central cord syndrome: a study of the natural history. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 82, 851–855 10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.9866 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Oleson C. Five., Burns A. S., Ditunno J. F., Geisler F. H., Coleman W. P. (2005). Prognostic value of pinprick preservation in motor complete, sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 988–992 ten.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pagliacci Thousand. C., Celani Grand. 1000., Spizzichino L., Zampolini M., Aito Due south., Citterio A., et al. (2003). Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni (GISEM) Grouping. spinal cord lesion management in Italy: a 2-yr survey. Spinal Cord 41, 620–628 10.1038/sj.sc.3101521 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Penrod Fifty. E., Hegde S. Thousand., Ditunno J. Eastward. (1990). Age effect on prognosis for functional recovery in acute, traumatic cardinal cord syndrome. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 963–968 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Perot P. L., Vera C. L. (1982). Scalp-recorded somatosensory evoked potentials to stimulation of nerves in the lower extremities and evaluation of patients with spinal cord trauma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388, 359–368 ten.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50802.10 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pointillart V., Petitjean Chiliad. E., Wiart 50., Vital J. K., Lassie P., Thicoipe M., et al. (2000). Pharmacological therapy of spinal cord injury during the acute phase. Spinal Cord 38, 71–76 10.1038/sj.sc.3100962 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Quian T., Guo X., Levi A. D., Vanni S., Shebert R. T., Sipski One thousand. L. (2004). High-dose methylprednisolone may cause myopathy in acute spinal string injury patients. Spinal Cord 43, 199–203 10.1038/sj.sc.3101681 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Raineteau O., Schwab One thousand. E. (2001). Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. ii, 263–273 ten.1038/35067570 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ramón South., Domínguez R., Ramírez L., Paraira M., Olona Thousand., Castelló T., et al. (1997). Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal String 35, 664–673 10.1038/sj.sc.3100490 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Roth Eastward. J., Lawler M. H., Yarkony K. Yard. (1990). Traumatic central cord syndrome: clinical features and functional outcomes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 18–23 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Roth E. J., Park T., Pang T., Yarkony Grand. Thousand., Lee M. Y. (1991). Traumatic cervical Dark-brown-Sequard and Brown-Sequard plus syndromes: the spectrum of presentations and outcomes. Paraplegia 29, 582–589 ten.1038/sc.1991.86 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sato T., Kokubun Due south., Rijal Yard. P., Ojima T., Moriai N., Hashimoto Yard., et al. (1994). Prognosis of cervical spinal string injury in correlation with magnetic resonance imaging. Paraplegia 32, 81–85 10.1038/sc.1994.14 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Schaefer D. One thousand., Flanders A. East., Osterholm J. L., Northrup B. E. (1992). Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase of cervical spine injury. J. Neurosurg. 76, 218–223 10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0218 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto One thousand., Farchi Due south., Laurenza L., Molinari M. (2011). Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal string lesions: an Italian comparison of neurological and functional outcomes. Spinal Cord 49, 391–396 x.1038/sc.2010.85 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto Thousand., Morganti B., Ditunno P., Ditunno J. F., Molinari Thousand. (2003). Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 41, 457–464 ten.1038/sj.sc.3101489 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto Thou., Morganti B., Molinari M. (2004a). Neurologic recovery of spinal cord injury patients in Italy. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 485–489 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00766-iv [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto G., Morganti B., Molinari M. (2004b). Sex-related differences of rehabilitation outcomes of spinal cord lesion patients. Clin. Rehabil. 18, 709–713 ten.1191/0269215504cr749oa [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Selden N. R., Quint D. J., Patel N., D'Arcy H. Due south., Papadopoulos South. G. (1999). Emergency magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spinal cord injuries: clinical correlation and prognosis. Neurosurgery 44, 785–792 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Shimada K., Tokioka T. (1999). Sequential MR studies of cervical cord injury: correlation with neurological damage and clinical result. Spinal Cord 37, 410–415 x.1038/sj.sc.3100858 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sipski One thousand. L., Jackson A. B., Gómez-Marín O., Estores I., Stein A. (2004). Furnishings of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1826–1836 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Song K. J., Kim Thou. H., Lee K. B. (2008). The efficacy of the modified classification system of soft tissue injury in extension injury of the lower cervical spine. Spine 33, E488–E493 ten.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b6191 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Stahlman 1000. C., Hanley Due east. N. (1992). Surgical management of spinal injuries, in Skeletal Trauma, eds Browner B. D., Jupiter J. B., Levine A. M., Trafton P. G. (Philadelphia: WB Saunders; ), 837–860 [Google Scholar]
• Steeves J. D., Lammertse D., Curt A., Fawcett J. W., Tuszynski M. H., Ditunno J. F., et al. (2007). International campaign for cures of spinal string injury paralysis. guidelines for the carry of clinical trials for spinal string injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial result measures. Spinal Cord 45, 190–205 10.1038/sj.sc.3102008 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Suberviola B., Gonzalez-Castro A., Llorca J., Ortiz-Melon F., Minambres E. (2008). Early complications of loftier-dose methylprednisolone in astute spinal cord injury patients. Injury 39, 748–752 10.1016/j.injury.2007.12.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Vaccaro A. R., Daugherty R. J., Sheehan T. P., Dante Due south. J., Cotler J. 1000., Balderston R. A., et al. (1997). Neurologic upshot of early on versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 22, 2609–2613 x.1097/00007632-199711150-00006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Doi South. A. (2013). The effects of the timing of spinal surgery after traumatic spinal string injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma 30, 1781–1794 10.1089/neu.2013.2932 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Donders A. R., Pouw Thousand. H., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Brusque A., et al. (2011). A clinical prediction dominion for airing outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort written report. Lancet 377, 1004–1010 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62276-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Pouw One thousand. H., EM-SCI Study Group, Van de Meent H. (2009). ASIA impairment scale conversion in traumatic SCI: is it related with the ability to walk? A descriptive comparison with functional ambulation result measures in 273 patients. Spinal Cord 47, 555–560 10.1038/sc.2008.162 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Waters R. L., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. Due south., Sie I. (1994a). Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 306–311 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Waters R. 50., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. S., Sie I. (1994b). Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 67–72 x.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Weinstein D. E., Ko H. Y., Graziani V., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1997). Prognostic significance of the delayed plantar reflex following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Med. 20, 207–211 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Wernig A., Muller S. (1992). Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 30, 229–238 10.1038/sc.1992.61 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Wilson J. R., Grossman R. Yard., Frankowski R. F., Osculation A., Davis A. M., Kulkarni A. V., et al. (2012). A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on astute clinical and imaging factors. J. Neurotrauma 29, 2263–2271 10.1089/neu.2012.2417 [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Yamashita Y., Takahashi Grand., Matsuno Y., Kojima R., Sakamoto Y., Oguni T., et al. (1991). Acute spinal string injury: magnetic resonance imaging correlated with myelopathy. Br. J. Radiol. 64, 201–209 10.1259/0007-1285-64-759-201 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Young J. S., Dexter W. R. (1979). Neurological recovery distal to the zone of injury in 172 cases of closed, traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 16, 39–49 10.1038/sc.1978.6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Immature West. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in spinal string injury, in Spinal Cord Monitoring, eds Schranml J., Jones S. J. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag; ), 127–142 [Google Scholar]
• Ziganow S. (1986). Neurometric evaluation of the cortical somatosensory evoked potential in astute incomplete spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65, 86–93 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90040-7 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Zörner B., Blanckenhorn W. U., Dietz V., EM-SCI Written report Group, Curt A. (2010). Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 27, 241–252 10.1089/neu.2009.0901 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

mayorgabeirst.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952432/

Share this post